Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 22nd November 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Saudi meeting of Afghans 'was not peace talks'



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 07 October 2008
A FORMER high-level Taleban official has said that he met last month in Saudi Arabia with representatives of the Taleban, the Afghan government and a powerful Afghan warlord.
But Abdul Salam Zaeef – the Taleban's former ambassador to Pakistan and a noted moderate – said the meeting could not be construed as a peace negotiation.

Mr Zaeef said he was invited by Saudi King Abdullah to share the Iftar meal with him one nig
ht. The meal is held each night during the holy month of Ramadan to break the daily fast.

"This is not new, it's a kind of a guest celebration," Mr Zaeef said. "The list included me, (former Taleban foreign minister Wakil Ahmad] Mutawakil, some from the Taleban, some from (warlord Gulbuddin] Hekmatyar, some from the government. We didn't discuss any issue of Afghanistan."

Mr Zaeef, who spent almost four years in the US military prison in Guantanamo Bay, said there were no "official" representatives from the Taleban or Hekmatyar, meaning there was no-one authorised to carry out peace talks.

The government of Hamid Karzai, Afghanistan's president, has long encouraged militants to lay down arms, but the Taleban leadership has largely rebuffed repeated overtures.

Saudi Arabia is a leader in the Sunni Muslim world and was one of a handful of countries that recognised the Taleban as rulers of Afghanistan in the 1990s.





The full article contains 233 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 06 October 2008 10:07 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Dragonhead,

Dalian,China 07/10/2008 01:56:24
More likely a strategy/funding trip.Strategy on how best to next stick it to the infidel.Securing more funding for sophisticated weapons and training,or to pick up a container load of Saudi diplomatic passports,etc,etc,etc.Cynical ole me.Now why would the Saudi's host terrorists and they are the only ones who officially recognised them? Any more reasons?
2

Dragonhead,

Dalian,China 07/10/2008 01:57:11
More likely a strategy/funding trip.Strategy on how best to next stick it to the infidel.Securing more funding for sophisticated weapons and training,or to pick up a container load of Saudi diplomatic passports,etc,etc,etc.Cynical ole me.Now why would the Saudi's host terrorists and they are the only ones who officially recognised them? Any more reasons?
3

Covert Action,

07/10/2008 06:40:05
yup, tactics plain and simple. Should have daisycut their little shindig.
4

American,

07/10/2008 21:20:12
Did anyone really expect "peace" from these talks??

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.