Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 26th July 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Wildlife heads for tipping point



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 16 May 2008
ANIMAL, bird and fish populations across the world have plummeted by almost a third in the past 35 years because of humans demanding too much from the planet, according to a new report.
Populations of species ranging from polar bears in Russia to African elephants in Tanzania continue to fall and international targets to stop biodiversity loss by 2010 are now "very unlikely" to be met, according to research by the wildlife charity W
WF.

Its campaigners say time is running out before a tipping point is reached when it will be too late to reverse the decline.

The research revealed that while species are suffering across the globe, humans are now consuming 25 per cent more resources than the planet can replace.

Human behaviour is causing habitats to vanish, sealife to be over-exploited and animals to be hunted to near extinction, according to the report 2010 and Beyond: Rising to the Biodiversity Challenge.

Dr Richard Dixon, director of WWF Scotland, said: "It's a pretty gloomy picture. Clearly our impact on the planet is growing and at the same time the populations of important species around the world are declining.

"A lot of these problems are because we have got a growing population and growing need for food and resources and there's often a competition between needing resources and biodiversity."

He said the global nature of the problem made it difficult for individual governments to address the crisis.

But he was hopeful progress was being made, particularly in terms of agreements made at the Bali meeting of the International Panel on Climate Change last year, and because of the attitudes of the US election candidates to the environment.

"We are on the brink. We have got to get this right or it's going to be too late and we will have really stuffed it up."

The charity has been tracking nearly 4,000 populations of species across the planet since 1970, and every two years reports on their progress.

The most recent figures, published today, found that overall populations of all species had declined by 27 per cent. Marine birds have been particularly hard hit, dropping by 30 per cent since the mid-1990s.

Colin Butfield, head of campaigns at WWF-UK, said: "Biodiversity underpins the health of the planet and has a direct impact on all our lives so it is alarming that, despite an increased awareness of environmental issues, we continue to see a downward trend. However, there are small signs for hope and if government grasps what is left of this rapidly closing window of opportunity, we can begin to reverse this trend."

The research looked at 241 species of fish, 83 amphibians, 40 reptiles, 811 birds and 302 mammals. It revealed that land-based species fell by 25 per cent, marine species by 28 per cent and freshwater species by 29 per cent between 1970 and 2005.

The study blames the drop in biodiversity on loss of habitat, over-exploitation due to activities such as fishing and hunting, pollution, the spread of invasive species and climate change – which all stem from human demands on the planet.

James Leape, the WWF director general, said: "Reduced biodiversity means millions of people face a future where food supplies are more vulnerable to pests and disease and where water is in irregular or short supply.

"No-one can escape the impact of biodiversity loss because reduced global diversity translates quite clearly into fewer new medicines, greater vulnerability to natural disasters and greater effects from global warming."

WWF has published the report just before the start of the Convention of Biological Diversity in Bonn on Monday.

It is calling on governments to use the conference to take urgent action to fulfil the commitment to reduce the rate of biodiversity loss by 2010.

Swordfish

NUMBERS of a group of swordfish in the north Atlantic studied by WWF fell dramatically.

They dropped from 34,000 tonnes of spawning stock in 1978, to just 8,000 in the most recent survey.

Not only are they being fished unsustainably, sharks are also being caught in nets intended for swordfish and their numbers are also being put under threat.

The swordfish, along with the marlin, is the fastest fish in the ocean, capable of reaching speeds of 120kmh in quick bursts.

Chimpanzee

WWF has been tracking a community of chimpanzees in Ivory Coast. Numbers have fallen from 74 to 33 since monitoring began. Chimps live in a variety of habitats in central and western Africa, but they are under threat.

The chief threat to the chimp's survival is loss of its forest habitat, much of which is being destroyed for timber and converted into farmland.

In West Africa, bushmeat hunters pursue chimpanzees relentlessly. Even though the animals are legally protected in some countries, the laws are often ineffective.

Atlantic salmon

A SHOAL of Atlantic salmon in Norway was part of the study by WWF. Numbers plummeted from 20 juveniles per 100 square metres in 1978 to just five per 100sq m in 1995.

Numbers have since picked up again, to 29 juveniles per 100sq m.

Among major threats to wild salmon populations is commercial salmon farming, which threatens to erode the gene pool through inter-breeding with escapees.

Climate change is also increasingly suspected of affecting the salmon at sea and is a major priority for action.

Polar bear

A POPULATION of polar bears in Russia has been tracked by WWF. Since the research started numbers have fallen from four dens per 100 square metres to three.

This week the US government declared the polar bear a threatened species.

The acceleration of the shrinking of Arctic ice continues to threaten the survival of these animals. Scientists predict that the numbers of polar bears will fall by about a third, if sea ice in the Arctic continues to melt at its present rate.

As well as climate change, pollution, oil development, over-harvesting and shipping are all threats to the polar bear. Polar bears are the largest predators that live on land and are twice as big as a lion.

African elephant

A STUDY of a group of African elephants in Tanzania has seen their numbers fall from 6,460 to 2,360.

International demand for ivory caused a catastrophic decline in African elephant populations in the 1970s and 80s. Poaching resulted in the population falling from an estimated 1.3 million animals in 1970 to just 600,000 by 1989.

The elephant's habitat has shrunk as it has been used for farming. Human-elephant conflicts – where elephants trample crops and damage infrastructure in search of food – are increasing.

Resources warning

IF EVERYONE used the world's resources at the rate we do in the UK we would need three planets to support us, according to WWF.

As well as measuring the biodiversity of species across the globe, the charity also tracks the "ecological footprint" of countries.

It bases the footprint on the natural resources used to live and the amount of carbon emissions generated.

Worldwide, humans now consume 25 per cent more resources than the planet can replace.

This compares with 1961, when mankind used onlyhalf of the planet's resources.

WWF's research shows humanity's "footprint" first grew larger than capacity in the 1980s and has been increasing ever since.

The report says our overuse of the planet's resources is due to factors such as the demands for food, energy and materials, and the replacement of natural ecosystems with towns and cities.

The US has the biggest ecological footprint, followed by the United Arab Emirates, Sweden and Canada. The UK is 14th on the list.

The charity has launched a One Planet Future Campaign, with the aim of helping people live a good quality of life while remaining within the Earth's capacity.














The full article contains 1299 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 15 May 2008 9:26 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Climate change
 
1

Kipling,

Life begins at home 16/05/2008 00:24:58
Nobody seems to have yet explored how far local authority bin collections of so-called garden waste are depriving the earth of natural low-level life and plants categorised as 'weeds' (eg, nettles). By encouraging the artificial 'tidying' up of the land a fundamentally necessary level of the ecosystem is being eliminated. I've come across at least one frog in a neighbour's bin, countless spiders, snails, etc. All of these form part of the food chain for other species as well as being attractive in themselves. The clean mowed image of nature -- no grass above 2 inches or rotting branches/leaves here, please! -- displayed in countless advertisements is a menace to small birds, butterflies, bees (essential for human life in the propagation of plants) and the rest of the small creatures which were once taken for granted but are becoming a rarity.
2

jerrymanders,

16/05/2008 00:31:11
#1

Just get rid of all cats and we will have at least 320 million birds more per year. Fact. The domestic moggy is the biggest killer of native birds. 10 million cats in the UK, killing an average of 32 birds a year each.
3

Kipling,

16/05/2008 01:42:38
#2. Whilst I initially agree with you, I see that the author of http://www.messybeast.com/ukferal.htm states "[cats] are blamed for the loss of songbirds, when the prime cause of this is destruction of habitat by humans (farming, house-building and industrial use)". In any case, they should have to wear bells round their necks as a first step, if not electronic bleepers which can be heard by birds though not necessarily humans.
4

DunCraig,

Brisbane 16/05/2008 03:39:34
If elephant numbers are declining, why is South Africa considering culling them, because of growing numbers?
5

DunCraig,

Brisbane 16/05/2008 03:39:37
If elephant numbers are declining, why is South Africa considering culling them, because of growing numbers?
6

Evan Owen,

Snowdonia 16/05/2008 07:32:34
Such hysteria based upon misinformation. How does manufacturing bells and electronic bleepers for cats help us? They would most probably be made in China using 19th century processes fuelled by coal fired power stations.

Humans will eventually go the same way as the dinosaur and the millions of species that have gone before us through natural selection, we are part of nature whether we like it or not and unless we stop breeding and breathing there isn't much we can do to prevent our inevitable demise.
7

Dave from Barra ©,

Western Isles 16/05/2008 07:49:13
Nothing that affects Scotland then. Thier focus is pointing in the wrong direction. The focus should be applied to those countries that are directly affected.

8

Sioux Man Chu,

16/05/2008 07:54:17
We need a cull on humanity - I vote we start with Charles Linskaill
9

sam the god,

16/05/2008 08:05:14
what the hootsman not blaming gamekeepers for this.
10

Nell,

The Preservation Hall 16/05/2008 08:07:16
No 7 Dave:- "Nothing that affects Scotland then".
Is Scotland not a part of the world?
11

Dave from Barra ©,

Western Isles 16/05/2008 08:15:57
Well I don't know about you Nell, but as far as I know Nell, Scotland isn't host to African Elephants, Polar Bears, Swordfish and Chimpanzee.

We are part time host to the Atlantic Salmon but believe we have a fairly pro-active Salmon industry that ensure continuity of stock.
We are certainly working toward it and have a host of provisions to protect wildlife in this country that is light years ahead of many other areas of the world. something that I am quite proud of, thanks.
12

Dave from Barra ©,

Western Isles 16/05/2008 08:16:21
Sorry for the double Nell, Nell. Apoplogies.
13

Unimpressed one,

16/05/2008 08:17:47
"Its campaigners say time is running out before a tipping point is reached when it will be too late to reverse the decline."

WWF have being saying this for decades. It's their raison d'etre so they can't claim anthing else. However when it comes to conservation programmes on the ground WWF is a pitiful organisation with a less than professional approach. Put simply, if the future prosperity of the planet's biodiversity depends on the efforts of WWF, FoE, and Greenpees then it is in peril.
14

Alan Reid,

NZ 16/05/2008 08:57:19
13 Unimpressed one, It's not the job of WWF, FoE, and Greenpeace to save biodiversity, it's such a huge task it has to come from the UN. All these groups can do is highlight the problems, if we choose to do nothing then there is no hope for us.
6 Evan Owen,Snowdonia
"Such hysteria based upon misinformation" Very wrong and a very stupid thing to say. So by that statement, your in the "don't tell me any facts, iv'e allready made up my mind" bunch, very sad.
15

Nell,

The Preservation Hall 16/05/2008 09:07:15
Dave:- I know Scotland isn't host to African elephants etc. and the protection of wildlife in Scotland is to be commended. But I think it will be a sad day for everyone if species such as the African elephant or chimpanzee disappears off this planet for ever. And in that sense I believe it does affect Scotland.
16

Tweedmouth,

Coldstream 16/05/2008 09:37:12
Propaganda is necessarily part of the activity of any campaigning NGO - but when the 'facts' being put forward are so at variance with reality - as in this case, then WWF damages its own credibility. Just ONE example: - polar bear numbers are at an all time high - having risen from an estimated 12,000 in the 1960s to an estimated 25,000 today (Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne announced to Associated Press recently)
http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5jeZXE458LYoHpZklZ_f4W4YjENbQ

"Hunting of polar bears is already restricted under US law after their numbers fell as low as 12,000 in the 1960s, and Kempthorne said ice melting posed the greatest danger now, not energy production or indigenous peoples.

The iconic bears' population has rebounded to an estimated 20,000-25,000, two-thirds of them in Canada,"

Richard Dixon is apparently a Science PHd. Would he like to comment on the statement in this article that:

"A POPULATION of polar bears in Russia has been tracked by WWF. Since the research started numbers have fallen from four dens per 100 square metres to three."

FOUR POLAR BEAR DENS PER 100 SQURE METRES!!!!!!

That means a polar bear about every 5 metres - a population density that would have John Cleese ranting about the 'majestic herds of polar bears swarming across the tundra in uncountable millions'.

in conclusion - STOP CRYING WOLF - oh I forgot - WWF has already blown any shred of scientific credibility by its absurd stand on 'Global Warming' - though since there has been no 'warming' since 1998 and the Northern Hemisphere just ahd the coldest winter on record - they don't have any island of reality to retreat to.
17

Dave from Barra ©,

Western Isles 16/05/2008 09:51:21
Fair enough Nell and I respect your opinion. As for myself, I will never know or feel the impact of the disappearance of any of the aforementioned species just as I cannot lament the loss of Beaver, Bear and Lynx from Scotland.

One step at a time. Lets sort our own backyard before meddling or lamenting in others, eh?
18

Partan,

Fife 16/05/2008 10:25:58
#4 DunCraig
The reason S Africa feels it will have to cull elephants is because, unlike other countries, they have been successfully protecting them for some time. Numbers swell, habitat is becoming more restricted and increasingly degraded by the grazing pressure put on it.
Other countries will not be culling because they've been unable to protect their elephants anyway. Hence their lack of elephants
19

eyeswider,

16/05/2008 17:09:24
"ANIMAL, bird and fish populations"

#2 jerrymanders

Damn right. Cats are amongst the most inefficient (7% - which is why they try to "bury" it - lest their predators feast on their protein rich waste) of all wild animals yet their "owners" purchase millions of tons of meat from abroad (that is ferried here at untold environmental cost) and an equal amount of fish which could otherwise be used as fertilizer (at the very least) to be wasted on their overindulged, feral "cutiepies". Do these people even think how longingly a real human being from some countries would gaze upon their "pet's" everyday fuel. A human being that could be sustained and educated for less than the cost of "keeping" a wild animal in our country.

Yet we have to cope with the millions of tons of excrement that is hardly ever dumped on the "owners" patch as these creatures are roaming around killing everything. Mostly because social inadequates need something to kick, or a "companion" because they can't make friends with the people next door, let alone empathise with a "foreigner".

20

,

16/05/2008 18:45:37
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
21

girnie wifie, Okanagan, BC,

BC 16/05/2008 21:04:36
Number 8: I am with you 100%! I have never understood what this guy is speaking about.
22

bythesea,

17/05/2008 15:50:17
One area where Scotland is drastically losing biodiversity is in marine fishes - in the last 20 years or so over 20 species of fish, once common in our waters, may now be considered locally extinct or in danger of becoming so in the very near future.

The cause is simple - poor fisheries management and policies, the solution is also simple - stop the destructive practices. So far, no government of any persuasion have grasped the nettle.

Fish and marine habitats are being destroyed at such a rate that our inshore waters will soon be devoid of all fish.

www.ssacn.org
23

Kipling,

@Doomray spec savers 17/05/2008 23:17:38
#22, bythesea: "So far, no government of any persuasion have grasped the nettle."

Probably because the nettles have all been binned.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Features

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.