Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Tuesday, 7th October 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

The Battle of Bannockburn 2008 may be a lost cause



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 26 July 2008
IT WAS the scene of Scotland's most famous victory over the English – and a turning point in the history of the nation.
But now the site of the Battle of Bannockburn, where Robert the Bruce famously triumphed over the English in 1314, is at the mercy of building developers.

A national conservation body warned yesterday that the site is likely to remain under threa
t from developers for years to come – despite the promise of long-awaited safeguards.

The National Trust for Scotland (NTS) fears Bannockburn may fail to qualify for a planned inventory of battlefields, because too much housing has already been allowed on and around the site in Stirlingshire.

The trust also fears that the proposed battlefield inventory will not give enough protection to historic sites, as it will not give councils the legal power to block planning applications.

Historic Scotland has proposed that battlefields accorded national significance status will have to be fully considered during any planning process. But it has already warned that there may be problems safeguarding sites like Bannockburn because academics and historians are divided over the exact location of the battlefield site.

NTS, which owns and is responsible for most of the Bannockburn site, says urgent action is needed to give it greater protection, because its landscape has been "compromised" so much by developments. Three years ago Stirling Council was forced to scrap plans to build two schools on part of the battlefield following a public outcry.

Robin Turner, the NTS's head of archaeology, said: "We are concerned that Bannockburn may not qualify for inclusion in the inventory, because its landscape has been compromised by development.

"We'd like to see the criteria adjusted to better reflect the full range of factors that make a battlefield of national significance. We'd argue that at sites – like Bannockburn – where parts of the battlefield have already been lost, there can be an even greater need to protect what survives."

Dr Gordon Barclay, Historic Scotland's head of national policy, said: "With the consultation on battlefields closed, we will now consider all the responses and suggested approaches, before Scottish ministers finalise and launch the policy paper."





The full article contains 366 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 25 July 2008 10:08 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Blah blah oil is me ,

26/07/2008 00:08:26
I doubt William Wallace fought for that to be used by the Scots.

All medieval war hero's dreamed of a future where land was there to be stared at, not worked or put to use.
2

Scullion,

Canada 26/07/2008 02:12:46
Wallace was dead some years when the battle was fought but the Scottish nobility in his time were very much like commercial concerns in ours-they do whatever suits their particular interests and care little for consequences, loyalty or honour.
3

Guga II,

Rockall 26/07/2008 05:31:51
#1.

When, exactly, did he tell you all about his dreams?
4

Jacqueline Hyde ,

On the shelf 26/07/2008 09:12:56
#3
I think #1 means "All medieval heroes dreamt . . .".
5

donald,

glasgow 26/07/2008 09:21:37
The National Trust have done their level best to demean the site for years.
6

jamboden1,

sydney 26/07/2008 09:57:15
It may well not be the exact place that the famous battle took place but it is and has been the place that everyone has visited and recognises as the place that it took place so ''hands off'' andleave it alone!
7

Neil,

Glasgow 26/07/2008 12:41:23
Scotland's heritage is its people & achievements, which more than match that of ony comparable nation in the world.

That heritage is not upheld by organisations committed to ensuring that nothing ever be done in today's Scotland.
8

Alba Abú,

Edinburgh 26/07/2008 17:53:02
Whats the use in keeping this site,as long as we are ruled by England.
9

Caora Dubh,

Croit sheasgair 26/07/2008 18:00:15
This battlefield has been repeatedly searched for artefacts using modern technology. There is nothing of value - it is just open ground that is not of special ecological concern either. Today's Scotland/Alba is also fighting a battle: a battle to house our people properly, to provide them with jobs, education and healthcare. Surely our ancestors would have approved of the ground being put to good use to uplift the Scots people?! Why not a Bruce High School and a Bannockburn Hospital? We can always have a small, sober and dignified monument to record that the district is the site of the famous battle. And what better monuments could there be than schools, hospitals and the like? I am sure the men who died on that battlefiled would have been delighted to know that one day it would become playing fields for Scots children.
10

,

26/07/2008 21:27:03
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
11

Iainbroch,

Moray 28/07/2008 00:34:10
I dont have a problem with a school. hospital or affordable/social housing being built there. As long as the site is marked by some appropriate monument!
Also if there was some green space where people can gather!
To out and out object to any development is not a rational response. Any development should be considered on its merits.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.