Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

The hunt is On.
Sponsored by
Can you track down Scotland's wildest beastie?

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Cameron took free flights to meet Rupert Murdoch in latest Tory yacht scandal



View Video
Download Video

Video

Lib Dem MP Chris Huhne on the Tory yacht scandal
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 24 October 2008
TORY leader David Cameron accepted free flights so he could hold talks with media tycoon Rupert Murdoch on his luxury yacht off a Greek island, it was disclosed today.
Mr Cameron was flown by private jet to Santorini on August 16 where he joined Mr Murdoch for drinks on his 184ft yacht, Rosehearty.

The Gulfstream IV belongs to public relations guru Matthew Freud who is married to Mr Murdoch's daughter, Elisabeth.

The Tories insisted Mr Cameron had done nothing wrong and that the flights had been fully declared in the Register of Members' Interests.

A spokeswoman for the Tory leader said: "Everything in connection to August 16 has been fully and properly declared."

Although Mr Cameron registered the fights last month, until now nothing had been made public about his visit to Mr Murdoch's yacht.

The disclosure is likely to add fresh fuel to the controversy surrounding shadow chancellor George Osborne's visit to the Russian billionaire Oleg Deripaska on his yacht off Corfu.

Mr Osborne has denied claims by the financier, Nat Rothschild, that he used the visit to try to solicit a £50,000 donation for Tory party funds, although he has admitted he was present when a possible donation by Mr Deripaska was discussed.

In the case of Mr Cameron, it has emerged that his wife, Samantha, and two of their children were with Mr Freud's party on his jet when it left Farnborough for the Mediterranean.

The aircraft then stopped off in Istanbul to pick up the Tory leader – who was returning from a visit to Georgia following the Russian military incursion – before flying on to Santorini.

Following drinks on the Rosehearty, Mr Cameron and his family attended a dinner party hosted by Mr Freud on his yacht, Elisabeth F.

Afterwards the Camerons were flown on the Gulfstream to Dalaman in Turkey where they joined Mrs Cameron's family for a sailing holiday to mark the 60th birthday of her mother, Viscountess Astor.

Meanwhile, according to The Independent newspaper, the Rosehearty sailed on to Corfu where Mr Murdoch held an on-board birthday party for his daughter, Elisabeth.

The guests were said to include Mr Osborne, Mr Deripaska and Peter Mandelson, then still the EU trade commissioner.

Mr Cameron's latest entry in the Register of Members' Interests declared: "16 August 2008, private plane from Farnborough to Istanbul for my wife and two children. Then from Istanbul to Santorini, and return to Dalaman, for myself, my wife and two children; provided by Matthew Freud, of London."

The Tories were dismissive of The Independent story. One source said: "This is a desperate attempt to make something out of nothing."

Meanwhile the Electoral Commission, which polices the party spending rules, has rejected calls for an investigation into Mr Osborne's conduct saying that it had seen no evidence of any offence.

Nevertheless the danger for the party is that the disclosures will create an impression of the party leadership as members of a gilded elite enjoying a life of luxury and privilege very different to ordinary voters.

It is in marked contrast to the rather more down-to-earth image Mr Cameron sought to present when he was photographed with his wife on a beach in Cornwall during the first leg of his holiday.

The Guardian, meanwhile, reported that Lord Mandelson's contacts with Mr Deripaska dated back earlier than has been previously acknowledged.

It is widely thought that it was Mr Osborne's disclosures about Lord Mandelson's meetings with Mr Deripaska while they were both guests of Mr Rothschild that prompted the financier to go public with his own claims about the shadow chancellor.

According to The Guardian, EU officials had said previously that Lord Mandelson, now the Business Secretary, had met the Russian "at a few social gatherings in 2006 and 2007".

However the paper said that the two men had been seen together by a journalist at a Moscow restaurant in October 2004 after Lord Mandelson was appointed trade commissioner but before he took up the post.

A Department for Business spokesman said: "Peter Mandelson's social and other contacts with Oleg Deripaska over a number of years have been well rehearsed.

"He does not believe anything is added by giving regular updates on dates and places where they met or in giving a retrospective running commentary of every meeting he has had with people he met during his time as EU trade commissioner.

"He is now focussed on his role as Business Secretary, helping businesses small and large to cope with the current economic downturn and to position themselves to come out stronger at the other side."

The full article contains 779 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

The Federalist (the poster formerly know as NAUON),

24/10/2008 11:11:46
This gets funnier by the minute.

The old saying about people in glass houses not throwing stones comes to mind.
2

suchaparcelofrogues,

Scotland 24/10/2008 11:20:16
Probably berating him for not publishing enough anti SNP stories and to pass on the next batch of anti SNP propaganda he should put out next.
3

A Better Way,

Scottish Republic 24/10/2008 11:33:16
Lets face it Cameron will probably only be the Prime Minister of whats left of the UK. Murdoch is much more powerfull than that. Cameron went to Murdoch to get the blessing of Don Murdoch for him to be Prime Minister.

What we dont know is if Murdoch actually allowed it?. This being a right of passage makes it a non story as far as the average person is concerned. We are influenced by the media therefore have no free will to vote for whom we please.
4

Tris,

24/10/2008 11:57:15


Is there a single one of them from any party that isn't sleazy?
5

A Clamper,

Edinburgh 24/10/2008 12:06:46
What happened to the bicycle ? Did he manage to get it on the Gulfstream and cycle round Murdochs' yacht while the election propaganda and finances were being sorted out?
6

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 24/10/2008 12:11:55
Bit of a slow news day I suppose....
7

G,

dundy 24/10/2008 12:19:12
A blatant attempt by the pro-SNP Scotsman to deflect attention away from the lack of action by Alex Salmond on the global credit crunch.....

Is David Cameron that dim that he can't see that taking "free" flights when he summoned by Murdoch looks bad?!
8

peteedinburgh,

Edinburgh 24/10/2008 12:23:48
This is a story of the "haves" and the "have yachts"
9

blackley,

Edinburgh 24/10/2008 12:25:01
My goodness these Tories move in high circles. Viscountess Astor eh? Nothing's changed really.
I think we'll stick with the son of the manse for better or worse.
10

brownlie,

24/10/2008 12:46:13
I seem to recall Tony Blair being summoned to a meeting with Murdoch!
11

Calum Crubag,

24/10/2008 12:46:31
#7 - pro-SNP Scotsman???!!!!!

The Unionists of Labour and Tory are united in SLEAZE. What a surprise.

Lets hope an independent Scottish parliament could start off a new slate and show a good example.Only if we leave behind old corrput London style politics.
12

JCA REID,

Annan 24/10/2008 12:49:07
Let's face it.....both sets of politicians are as bad as each other. They're ALL skimming & creaming off the top for freebies, & "I'll do summat for you, but it's gonna cost you!"
The entire business of running this country is purely ancillary to the main business of what can I screw out of the time I have in Parliament!
13

Alec M,

Falkirk 24/10/2008 13:15:14
Murdoch seems to have more fingers in pies than the Pope has Catholics.
14

Iain's,

24/10/2008 13:21:56
Mandleson is definitely back!

Do you fools not realise that IT IS ALL ABOUT THE ECONOMY STUPID!

This childish tittle-tattle is what today's UK is all about.

I would love to comment truthfully on this story but the UK's draconian NO freedom of speech laws do not allow me to.
I would be arrested for being anti-gay AND anti-semitic, and anti New Labour and anti Gordy-Broon and so on............
But I suppose that being a gay jew is a difficult cross to bear. Is that just a mixed metaphor or have I broken the law? God knows.
15

Iain's,

24/10/2008 13:24:30
´A Department for Business spokesman said: "Peter Mandelson's social and other contacts with Oleg Deripaska over a number of years have been well rehearsed'.
God he even rehearses the stuff!
16

Iain's,

24/10/2008 13:29:12
Rothschilds and Astors. Back to the 1930s with New labour.
17

Mr. Lachie Todd,

EdinburghEdinburgh 24/10/2008 13:33:24
As we have seen down the years, ALL politicians are susceptible to corrupt practices.

However, when it comes to financial, political, and sexual scandals, you can always rely on serial offenders like the Tories!

These reports could not have come at a worse time for Tory young bucks Cameron and Osborne, and only serves to remind the voters that the Conservative and Unionist Party will always be synonymous with sleaze!

The rest of the population is now facing the prospect of a severe economic downturn with the loss of jobs and homes!

Yet,here we have two grasping, greedy Tories soliciting for financial and politicial favours for themselves and their party whilst swaying about in their sugar daddies yachts!

It is noticeable that we have yet to hear from the leader of the North British Tories and members of her blue-rinse party about the ill-judged conduct of her Southern cousins? The silence is deafening!














18

Alastair the First,

24/10/2008 13:53:05
14: are you suggesting that all these luxury yachts are being used for some sort of homosexual orgy? I can just imagine Mandelson standing there and when told that the plebs are unhappy, he says "Sodom".
19

,

24/10/2008 14:00:00
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
20

Shredder,

24/10/2008 15:03:29
A "gilded elite"!!! This has become a veritable media feeding frenzy to such an extent that they can make hay even when there's been no actual wrongdoing.

While we're on the subject, what a sorry sight the Nats are making of themselves on the other thread, gloating over the fact that one of Sarah Brown's party minders obviously lacked good people skills.

Please oh Scotsman, can we have another juicy piece of Nationalist sleaze? There's been nothing since Trumpgate and, with the gloss just beginning to peel off Supernat following the "Iceland" debacle, now's the time to get in there.
21

dude,

wishaw 24/10/2008 15:12:50
Shredder

once Mandy hes finished with the tories he will set his sights on the SNP, but you see the SNP is a party of the people and are doing a sterling job of running the country on westminsters terms, just wait to you see what they will do once they have control over the full country
22

dude,

wishaw 24/10/2008 15:16:38
i should have added that the SNP have a full dodgy dossier of retribution on the labour liars and charlatans who populate new labour if they try, i think the labour party has more skeletons in the cupboard than all the partys put together so they should not have started this 'war' another bad move by the liebour party
23

Shredder,

24/10/2008 15:44:45
#21 dude: at last! A Nat who's able to think outside his narrow sectarian box. If the Nats do take up your suggestion that they stand in non Scottish constituencies and eventually achieve control over the full country, that would indeed be a sure fire way to put their separation policy into effect.

There was a rumour a few years ago that the Scot Nats were considering putting up a candidate for London Mayor, but your suggestion undoubtedly takes this a few steps further.

Bet Supernat would think himself completely unstoppable, as he could pull of his usual trick in Scotland by managing to appeal to both the traditional Tory vote in the south east and the rock solid Labour vote in the north. Eureka!
24

rorie,

alloa 24/10/2008 16:14:23
oh dear, thur a' it it.
25

Alan B,

24/10/2008 16:15:22
The labour tactic is obvious. Spread the mud and dirt.

They are well behind in the opinion polls so if they can divert the whole thing to sleaze, the voters will be left with a choice of choosing between the least sleaziest between labour and the tories.

Labour always remind me of: if they go down everyone goes down. the tories, the country. Scuttle the whole thing.
26

vimto,

24/10/2008 16:17:25
25. iT'S NOT lABOUR WHO DID THE DIRTY!
27

Alan B,

24/10/2008 16:19:18
Cannot really see what is wrong with accepting a free flight to meet Murdoch.

Accepting a holiday or things for personal gain is wrong. Or soliciting illegal donations as Osbourne has been accused of is wrong.

As was pointed out. Labour paid for Blair's flight to meet Murdoch. Labour would have got that money from a donation from another business man.

I think we should concentrate sleaze when it actually occurs and not trying to invent it. Which seems the case here.
28

dude,

wishaw 24/10/2008 16:21:18
You cannot be serious AM2 has those views also, there is nothing sectarian about the SNP or me neither, you are another matter right enough.

My post on the dodgy dossier was jest cause i dont think they have any slease on the SNP that would stand up to scrutiny or the lies of a proven and discredited liar who just so happens to be flavour of the month with calamity brown. The political situation seems to be a bit more mature about this kind of smear tactics because the Scottish people are more aware of the lies of new labour, iraq war, WMD ie. Trident and many other issues.

Also our first minister Alex Salmond does not need to go after anyones vote, most of Scotland is waking up to the fact the SNP are Scotlands future and are willingly giving the SNP their vote.
29

Alan B,

24/10/2008 16:21:56
#vimto

This whole sleaze issue started with the Osbourne and Mandelson affair.

Osbourne let it be known that Mandelson slagged Brown off while they accept hospitality from Rotheschild on his yaught. Rotheschild then hit back for his pal Mandie and said Osbourne was trying to solicite illegal donations.

The Cameron story is irrelevent and just trying to stitch stories together.

30

vimto,

24/10/2008 16:28:57
29,Alan. The point is our political system is flawed,who can you trust,and who tells the truth!
31

brownlie,

24/10/2008 16:30:47
26 vimto

In the summer of 2006 Tony Blair flew to California for a meeting with Murdoch and to address his conference. I wonder who paid for his flight? Murdoch was described by a Downing Street source as the "hidden member of the Cabinet"!!
32

TWC,

Ayrshire 24/10/2008 16:30:58
Yup Both of them have been caught in this particular Sleaze trap, but the only difference is that the tories didn't take the money and not declare it -- while Newabour did.
33

lulach mac gille coemgain,

24/10/2008 16:31:04
Next we’ll be getting Gordon Broon goin’ ‘round the doors in glenrothes hopin’ to get his representative a wee handoot o votes at the ballot boxes - eeey !

Nice n Sleeeezey does it !
34

brownlie,

24/10/2008 16:33:35
29 Alan B

"... the Osbourne and Mandelson affair." - tell us more!!
35

"Hoots" Fandango,

Hamilton 24/10/2008 16:41:39
30
vimto,

"The point is our political system is flawed,who can you trust,and who tells the truth!"

Trust me. I always tell the truth.
36

"Hoots" Fandango,

Hamilton 24/10/2008 16:42:28
Sleaze all round right enough. The fragrant Mrs Brown got a free cup of tea in Glenrothes.
37

Alan B,

24/10/2008 16:43:31
#brownlie

seemingly Mandelson made an ass of it :)
38

Alan B,

24/10/2008 16:47:20
#vimto

Agree. Mandelson does seem worse than most.

I would trust neither the current labour mob or the tories.

Atleast scottish parliament sleaze is over £950 or dodgy taxi receipts and gets some resignations.

But you are right the corruption or working the system with the John Lewis list and Micheal Martin, Ed Balls and his wife dodgy mortages means you would trust none of them as it all seems so wide spread.
39

Brian M,

24/10/2008 16:52:32
never trust a party politician
40

vimto,

24/10/2008 17:01:28
So, it seems none of our political parties can be trusted,basically we are up the creek without a paddle!
41

Brian M,

24/10/2008 17:02:59
#40 power and being shadow power corrupts
42

vimto,

24/10/2008 17:06:03
41. That is the understatement of the year, it seems all UK political parties are corrupt!
43

vimto,

24/10/2008 17:09:41
Can we please have a UK political party without a hidden agenda!
44

Alan B,

24/10/2008 17:11:52
#40 vimto

Labour promised so much about getting rid of sleaze but have been more openly dirty than the tories were.

Partly becuase of the new rules over donations and loans labour brought in.

While i am not against first the past post per se, one of the disadvantages is that it only really gives people 2 choices for government. And when both are dirty we are up a creek.

The only think we can hope is the media force resignations every time they step out of line and the rules are tightened.

In the scottish parliament, i would say labour are far worse than the rest. Largely because of being the dominent power in local government so long and being voted in in scotland no matter what.

But with the wendy thing and labour refusal to see that it was wrong the electrate need to show that corruption is not acceptable and vote for one of the other 3 main parties.

The media needs to keep politicians on their toes and point out weaknesses and abuse of the system.
45

Alan B,

24/10/2008 17:16:58
#Brian M

"power and being shadow power corrupts"

Do not know if that is true. I think it is more that those that climb to the top of the greasy poll within a political party are to a large extend not the type of person that you want to lead the country.

As such they are to some extend corrupt already and accept the way the political environment works.

For instance i find it difficult to see why blair and mandelson both much further to the right than 70s tories under heath would every have joined the labour party when they disagreed with nearly everything the labour party stood for at that time.
46

57vintage,

Bridge of Don 24/10/2008 17:18:13
"i dont think they have any slease on the SNP that would stand up to scrutiny"

It exists.

I have names, addresses, dates where A Senior Party Member was involved in extra-curricular activity which might damage That Individual's reputation.

No more info as I'm discreet.
47

Alan B,

24/10/2008 17:30:12
#57vintage

I think there is big difference between financial sleaze with illegal donations etc and also taking advantage of the system for financial gain, and having affairs etc.

I do not regard that McConnell had an affair as sleaze. It was a shame that he had to come out and admit it as it was irrelevent. Fair enough if someone is saying something in public and practising something different in their private lives.

Likewise that Mckaskill got arrested drunk at a football game or Foulkes getting arresting drunk. They are just silly stories of a person acts like any other person.

As such i think we should keep to financial sleaze and impropriety.
48

Alan B,

24/10/2008 17:34:48
#57vintage

Do you have any evidence of financial sleaze within the snp. Evidence of salmond and co soliciting illegal donations like Osbourne has been alleged to have done and so many in labour have actually done. Do you have evidence salmond was on yaughts of the rich and famous getting up to no good.

Whose s**** who is irrelevent and we should hold those who get involved in dodging dealing to account and not try to justify it becuause someone is sleeping with someonelse.
49

The Spook in Leith,

24/10/2008 17:38:11
Still hope the Conservatives boot labour out from Government just like the SNP did in Scotland..
50

Dunnie,

Canada 24/10/2008 18:48:54
Spook - my Magpies are in recession.
51

Jimmy Le Pie,

24/10/2008 19:09:30
#20 Shredder

Can you imagine the Scottish press and the BBC if the SNP had threatened to shoot journalists???
52

vimto,

24/10/2008 19:48:22
49. I'm beginning to wonder,maybe it's a case of "out of the frying pan into the fire"!
53

Dr Finlay,

Tannochbrae 24/10/2008 19:51:15
Why is anyone the slightest bit surprised at this story?

Since the dawn of history, politicians have used their positions of influence to enrich themselves and their friends - accepting "free" gifts and favours is simply one aspect of the psychopathic personality that makes success in politics more likely - "what is good for me must be good for the country/the public/civilisation and therefore OK!".

Registration of gifts is merely a mechanism invented by Parliament to legalise self enrichment.

Anyone who thinks that one group are any different from the rest are fooling themselves. If they haven't been caught yet, it means that they are either very good at it or waiting for the right opportunity to come along.

54

vimto,

24/10/2008 19:56:20
53. That was an excellent program,hows Dr Cameron and Janet!
55

Dr Finlay,

Tannochbrae 24/10/2008 20:02:43
54.

Not so good! He was struck off for corruption and had to turn to politics instead. Poor Janet died of a tea overdose.
56

Team Scotland,

Rocking the Boat 24/10/2008 20:07:59

http://tinyurl.com/5uo4ex
57

JoeMiddleton,

Edinburgh 25/10/2008 00:01:05
Liebour/Tories both sucking up to Murdoch... is there any difference?
58

Phil C,

25/10/2008 08:30:28
Another diversionary anti-Tory non-story, hoping that some mud will stick. Rupert Murdoch is one of the slimiest toads in the media. Unfortunately he is a very powerful slimy toad! He is an arch manipulator. It's no surprise that politicians are nice to him!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.