Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

The hunt is On.
Sponsored by
Can you track down Scotland's wildest beastie?

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Cameron: It's time to pull the plug on bloated pay deals of BBC bosses



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 04 November 2008
DAVID Cameron has called for top BBC salaries to be slashed as he pledged to cut the licence fee if he becomes prime minister.
The Conservative leader's attack on the "bloated BBC" follows the obscene-calls row involving Jonathan Ross, the £6 million-a-year chat-show host, and presenter Russell Brand, who has since quit the corporation.

Fifty BBC executives are paid more than £189,994, the salary of the Prime Minister. Mr Cameron called for the bumper pay deals to be reined in.

"Why on earth is the director-general (Mark Thompson] paid more than £800,000 a year? More than 50 people of this great public institution get more than the Prime Minister," he wrote in an article for The Sun newspaper. "It's become bloated, with many of its executives overpaid."

Mr Cameron, a former boss at rival ITV's Carlton firm, also warned that the BBC could "crush" smaller media and internet companies as it piled into other areas of business. Its plans for online local news video could hit local newspapers, he said.

"The squeezing and crushing of commercial competitors online or in publishing needs to be stopped," he said.

Mr Cameron pointed to the corporation's buy-out of the Lonely Planet travel guides as a questionable acquisition.

Jeremy Hunt, the shadow culture secretary, recently called for an examination of the BBC's impact on competition with its plans to spend £25 million on local websites.

The Tory leader said that the broadcaster should give back any leftover sums from the digital switchover.

"The BBC was given extra money for digital and if that money isn't spent on digital, I think instead of finding new ways to spend it, perhaps that money could be given back to licence-fee payers," he told BBC Radio 4's World at One.

"There are issues of overpayment. There are issues of it piling into areas where sometimes it can crush small businesses starting up on the internet or in education or tourism, where perhaps it shouldn't be going."

Mr Cameron raised the prospect of cutting back the activities of the corporation, which he said "had become oversized and overreached itself".

Meanwhile, Sir Michael Grade, the ITV chief executive, yesterday called for less swearing in British broadcasting in the wake of the BBC phone row.

Sir Michael, who defected from the BBC to ITV in 2006, said that the furore caused by the obscene calls made by Ross and Brand to the 78-year-old actor Andrew Sachs should trigger a debate on taste and decency.

Speaking at a lunch with the Broadcasting Press Guild, Sir Michael said British broadcasters had become too casual in allowing swearing. He said: "I think there is a kind of pattern in the prevalence of bad language and the 'F-word' is a little unrestrained. I don't think we take enough care of the use of the F-word and similar words. It used to be that you would have to get a very, very senior sign-off to use that word in a show."

• Jeremy Clarkson has sparked fresh BBC controversy by joking about murdering prostitutes.

The Top Gear presenter, 48, made the quip about lorry drivers killing sex workers on Sunday night's BBC2 show.

His comments came after Steve Wright, a former lorry driver, was convicted in February of murdering five prostitutes in Ipswich. Clarkson's joke sparked 188 complaints.


WHAT NEXT

MOVES to rein in bumper BBC pay packets may drive the broadcaster's biggest stars away.

The growing public backlash amid a looming recession means the days of £18 million three-year contracts – like that of Jonathan Ross – are coming to a close. There are fears that top presenters such as Graham Norton, Jeremy Paxman and Fiona Bruce could decamp to rivals, including Sky and ITV.

Mark Thompson, the director general of the BBC, will discuss pay with the organisation's executive remuneration committee. On Sunday, Mr Thompson admitted the BBC could secure the best talent "for less than we have been able to do in the last few years".

However, Ross, who left the risqué message on the answer phone of the actor Andrew Sachs, is not alone in securing a generous contract.

Paxman, whose jibes against the "Scottish Raj" have landed him in trouble in Scotland, earns £1 million a year.

Meanwhile, Norton earns £2.5 million a year and newsreader Bruce is on an annual salary of £800,000.

The full article contains 751 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 04 November 2008 1:04 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: The BBC , Conservative Party
 
1

Murray in Canada,

Salt Spring Island 04/11/2008 00:13:14
As I say on another thread, I'd like to know who decides on these bloated salaries and remunerations. Who's ultimately in charfe of the purse?
As for the prospect of losing folk like Ross et al. to otrher networks, it wouldn't faze me one bit. I write as an expatriate outsider, but surely there's more talent in the UK [or even Scotland] than these presumably popular names.
As for the famous fricative word, there's no harm in its use AS LONG AS it [like any "swearword" or whatever] is not used in abuse of innocent bystanders, however well-known they are.
So these louts should be fired, and not profit any more from a salary as obscene as their language.
2

Shamus,

Glasgow 04/11/2008 00:16:47
1# So speaks for Scotland the Rev I am Murray from Canada.
3

,

04/11/2008 01:04:13
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
4

Joseph Gibson,

Ayrshire, UK 04/11/2008 01:08:44

Atleast these overpaid executives do work, unlike politicians who have nearly there whole families employed and raking in taxpayers more... I think what Mr Cameron ment to say was "Why on earth can such executive get paid more than a prime minister, I want such pay deals"

People have to wake up and use their brains, and use there eyes. It was the Conservatives that made Britain a privatised country, and we all know that Mr Cameron would probably follow in the footsteps of Magaret Thatcher, and probably do much worse.
5

Joseph Gibson,

Ayrshire, UK. 04/11/2008 01:15:30

...The Conservatives are only looking for ways to achieve votes, members and influence. Labour are no better, but atleast allow Labour to finish off what its started, or should we allow the Conservatives to get into power and undo everything Labour have done, and then create their own mistakes instead of learning.

There is a saying in the United States, that the Democrats get power, do alot for the economy and then mess up, Republicans use it, gain support and win and then undo everything the Democrats had achieved and then do their own. What does this do? Well... it costs "us" the taxpayer alot of money, tax's are raised, more tax's are introduced and government sieze more control, or private instituations that are government controlled ie. a government fall guy.

The United Kingdom, the British people... are in a much better position than our forefathers were, our mothers & fathers grandparents had much harder times than us, struggled far much more than us... the question we should ask ourselfs; Do we want those times back?
6

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 04/11/2008 08:53:20
One of the main reasons that the BBC is (over)-indulged is that it has now become the Pravda of the broadcasting world with heavily slanted reporting on political matters especially in favour of Labour. Nowhere is this more evident that Scotland.

Like most government enterprises no questioning is done on value for money, just raise the fee year on year with a squeak. Well now the mice have arisen!
7

Doh,

04/11/2008 09:11:27


The sheet hypocrisy of the Conservatives is breathtaking.

What about obscene salaries for bankers - cant remember them complaining about that.

Also I think that top Tory spin doctor is pocketing a mere £250,000 a year.

No point in throwing money at a problem, unless it is a Tory of course.
8

Watson,

Irvine 04/11/2008 09:18:00
If you want to see a BBC or EBC programme you should have the choice to pay for it or not watch it. The licence fee (Tax) should be abolished.
9

Paddi,

04/11/2008 09:20:11
It’s not the BBC that should be reined in, its politicians with their never ending expenses, huge salaries, gold plated final salary pension schemes, junketing, perks, massive holidays etc and to cap it all 90% of all legislation is foisted on us from those unaccountable bodies in Brussels.

Get rid of the bloated, utterly useless, political class Mr Cameron before you start on the BBC.
10

The Spook in Leith,

04/11/2008 09:21:42
Cameron: It's time to pull the plug on bloated pay deals of BBC bosses.

I agree, this is a state owned corporation and i think it is disgusting tax payers money is being used to pay fat bbc staff lavish wages, lets face it the BBC is nothing like it used to be, in fact i prefer STV and Setanta.
11

Ugly George,

Edinburgh 04/11/2008 09:32:57
7 Doh
Are any of the salaries you quoted comparable to the £6 million pa for Jonaton Ross?
12

Doh,

04/11/2008 09:47:31

#11

Yes.

Bunch of bankers.
13

Thomas Aikenhead,

Edinburgh 04/11/2008 09:48:19
It is an excellent start! Don't stop with the BBC, have a look at other sectors as well, and that includes the banks as they are now taking public money!

The difference between what senior executives get paid (in both the private and public sectors) and the average national salary has widened dramatically under this Labour government.

The income inequality is NOT justified and should be reversed. The old lament;
"If we did not pay them they would leave" will be heard but here is a radical thought - LET THEM GO!

See how many are so talented that they are able to obtain similar conditions elsewhere.

The simple fact is that many senior managers are time-servers rather than talented and can easily be replaced by junior staff at a fraction of the cost.

As ordinary folk loose jobs, homes and live on a tight budget through no fault of their own tolerance of the 'fat cats' will disappear. Any shrewd politician should thinnk about this.
14

long live the supermarkets,

I love the BBC 04/11/2008 09:53:56
Dear Mark Thomson
I know you've had a bad week but i think your worth every penny of your £800,000 plus salary and i think the other executives are worth every penny anyway Mark Ive got this great idea for a chat show we could bring on major celebs who are plugging there book or film i could talk about myself and my pugs exploits you know the fact that there incontinent i could look down the dresses of the females ask them a lot of rude questions,then if you let me on the radio i could phone up old people and abuse them over the phone the mugs oops sorry Mark the licence payers will love it,what do you think Mark?
15

EnglishHighlander,

04/11/2008 10:08:33
I'm sorry, but, the day the BBC goes, the day any quality programing disappears as well!

STV and Setanta? Don't make me laugh! The whole ITV network is a complete joke, with the majority being dire, empty-headed programs with very, very few exceptions.

Channel 4 has easily overtaken ITV for quality and that channel in itself is not that good.

The saturation of satellite channels churning out repeat after repeat has effectively killed of the TV as the leading form of home entertainment.

Switch it off and get out more! Better still, read a good book and talk to the wife and kids whilst sat round the dining table.
16

Alasdair,

04/11/2008 10:32:27
Exactly. The BBC may have its faults, but it's one of the few great institutions of this country, and one for which we should be justifiably proud.

At the heart of Cameron's policies is the persistent belief that the free market can provide both quality and variety. This wildly erroneous belief covers his opinion on everything from broadcasting to, laughably, economics. He is about as trustworthy as a snake.
17

Slartibartfast,

The Fifth Dimension 04/11/2008 10:38:34
It's time to pull the plug on the BBC.
18

Mallory,

Edinburgh 04/11/2008 10:46:50
(1) Why does the BBC pay the National Lottery to screen the weekly draws? Surely this is promoting a commercial operation and should be paid for by Camelot.

(2) Why does the BBC need to run so many channels? 90% of its programming is already well catered for by commercial operations and I cannot understand why rubbish like soap operas, cooking programmes and make-overs deserve any public funding when they can be sponsored.

(3) What right has the BBC to use its guaranteed income stream from a poll-tax to eliminate competition from local news operations in the UK?

(4) Why are 175 BBC bods needed to report on the US election when most will simply be in a hired studio and comments on the output of US networks?


19

Westfield Bairns,

falkirk 04/11/2008 10:47:32
Oh dear one avenue of Unionist propoganda lost if the BBC goes
20

Miss H,

04/11/2008 11:13:20
Pitch for the Daily Nail brigade. Of very little relevance here so why is it the main story?
21

Cauchy Riemann,

Wales 04/11/2008 11:18:45
#8 Watson wrote:
"If you want to see a BBC or EBC programme you should have the choice to pay for it or not watch it. The licence fee (Tax) should be abolished."

Agreed. The idea of being forced to pay a licence fee is ridiculous in this day & age. With everything going digital there is no reason why (if the bbc reject advertising) that it can't be a subscription service that people choose to pay for or not.

The bbc claim the licence fee is 'great value for money'. Well if that is the case then people will freely subscribe. So why make it legally compulsory and hunt down and prosecute mainly single mothers?

As to quality, the bbc lost it long ago anyway.
22

Galaman,

Galashiels 04/11/2008 12:16:12
Never was the old saying, "He who deserves least, gets most" more appropriate. David Cameron has clearly never heard it.
23

John south of Soutra,

04/11/2008 12:32:35
#15 - the stpry is about the bloated salaries being paid to their executives, and if you believe that the BCC produce more quality programmes you really are living in the past
24

Findlay Thompson,

04/11/2008 12:51:19
Tell me posters, why should I pay for this TV Licence?
25

Alan B,

04/11/2008 12:54:25
While Cameron is just jumping on the populist bandwagon, he is correct.

The BBC is a public sector broadcaster and as such it should not be throwing public money around in this way.

The fact that labour have allowed this just shows what an utterly contemptable party they are. But is all part of them buying off the BBC. The BBC is just far too biased towards labour that it undermines its integrity and democracy at large.
26

JayDeeTee,

04/11/2008 12:56:03
Time to call a halt to bloated party donations as well.
27

Alan B,

04/11/2008 12:56:47
Radio should be commercialised and spun of from the BBC.

The type of radio show that caused the outrage in the first place is classic comercial type of radio. It can hardly constitute as public sector broadcasting.
28

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 04/11/2008 12:56:57
SCANDALOUS!

Here in Canada we have the same problem with our CBC (Canadian Broadcasting Corporation) executives and their obscene salaries.

But at least we don't have to pay an upfront fee to the CBC (am I rhyming or something?).

We pay through the nose by our taxes.

Kick out all the underachievers at the upper management echelons who have reached their level of incompetence and stupidity.
29

brusque,

04/11/2008 12:59:38
If the BBC do decide to cut costs, I hope Glen Campbell, who can't conduct an impartial interview if his life depends on it, is one of the first to go.

I'm sure Maggie Broon will be able to find a job for him, maybe he could be the Ambassador to Malawi on the days when Jack is busy with constituency business..............which must be few and far between these days. Is Jack still a Labour MSP?

30

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 04/11/2008 13:05:54
Also, I think Graham Norton is worth every pound of his salary and he gets fabulously funny guests on his show and there is also REAL audience participation.
31

Alan B,

04/11/2008 13:35:19
#brusque

Yes Glen Campbell is a joke of an interviewer. Cannot believe labour have undermine democracy so much by corrupting the national broadcaster.

32

Guga II,

Rockall 04/11/2008 13:49:02
The iniquitous television tax should be scrapped. Not only does it hit the less well off the hardest, but, in this day and age where television is used as the main source of news and information for people, it is a tax on information.

Moreover, the EBC should be forced to compete on the open market. They already have advertising on their television stations; admittedly it is primarily self-advertising, but it is advertising nonetheless.

If anyone wants to keep the EBC in its current format, then it should be changed to an encrypted, subscription service.

It is also against the principles of fair trade, when one service is subsidised by the public, to the detriment of other television stations. This is also true of the fact of making people who never watch, or want to watch the EBC and its biased programming, pay for them, regardless.

As for their threatening tone regarding non-payment that is a disgrace; as is the maximum fine for not paying the television tax. The size of the fine is such that it is obviously treated as a more serious offence than mugging an old lady.

It's time that this iniquitous tax was scrapped, and that the control of broadcasting in Scotland was given to the Scottish people. We need to be free of the colonial control of the EBC, most of whom probably wouldn't even be able to find Scotland on a map.

The colonial attitude of the EBC can be seen the way they use reporters from England to report on a story in Scotland for their main news, despite the fact that the same story is covered on Reporting Scotland by a Scottish reporter.

Everyone in Scotland should refuse to pay the iniquitous television tax to the EBC, and bring down this vestige of English colonialism.

The television tax is an archaic anachronism and, like the EBC, should be scrapped.

33

Hagar,

Somerset 04/11/2008 14:27:06
#32 - Guga II - Yes & down here we even have Scottish people giving us local weather reports...
GUGA - YOU ARE DRIBBLINGLY INSANE! But the license fee should go.
By the way, post devolution, exactly what do Scottish MPs do in Westminster? Oh yes they legislate on England, not affairs affecting their own constituents.
English colonalism? Absolute B*llsh*t*
34

57vintage,

Keith 04/11/2008 15:27:13
#7 "The sheer hypocrisy of the Conservatives is breathtaking"

Especially since their creed has been to allow the market to make the decisions.

Ross et al are unique in being themselves and therefore exploit their market position. Them's the rules you created, Eton boy. Live with it or change it.

And surely those who wish to abolish public service broadcasting have fallen into the free market trap of having to subscribe to everything? I'll stay with the licence fee rather than dole out my hard-earned to a tax dodging right winger like Murdoch, thanks.

I like the BBC, despite its all too obvious flaws. Some of its world-leading radio stuff would not be considered for production or broadcast by the profit-chasing private broadcasting sector, I'm afraid, leading to even more dumbing down of our soma-fed population.

35

danielrober,

04/11/2008 15:50:59
The BBC is a national service, part funded by taxation and part funded by income earned. If the other nationalised industries were as well run as the BBC this country would be considerably richer.

Then there again its an annual cash lump sum counted in the billions.If British Energy was given this sum we would have no fuel bill crisis. That's not sour grapes, that's just business.

£18 million over three years, lets see the income earned on exports of Ross's show? If he generates this sum in income earned i.e. export like Dr Who - no problem. If not, then he's paid too much because Ross is not bigger than the BBC.
36

brusque,

04/11/2008 17:25:56
#35

£18 million over three years, lets see the income earned on exports of Ross's show? If he generates this sum in income earned i.e. export like Dr Who - no problem. If not, then he's paid too much because Ross is not bigger than the BBC.


The BBC don't make a penny on Ross's Show, it is produced by his own company, Hot Sauce, so he owns the rights to it.

The BBC get nothing, zero, nada, in return for Ross, except the audience figures, which are around 3 to 4 million, depending on the popularity of the guest.

37

Cauchy Riemann,

Wales 04/11/2008 19:01:35
#34 wrote:
"And surely those who wish to abolish public service broadcasting have fallen into the free market trap of having to subscribe to everything?"

No, its called FREEDOM to choose. If people want to watch the bbc then fine, and if people don't want to then that is also fine.

Those supporting a compulsory tv licence fee are every bit as intolerant and fundamentalist in their attitude as the Taliban.

Analogy: "Hi I'm a member of the taliban. Women should cover their head. No, of course these women shouldn't be free to choose whether to cover their head or not. Who cares if the majority of people want freedom for women to cover their head or not. Woman's head covering is compulsory and failing to cover their heads should be punished by law"

"Hi I'm a supporter of the bbc, which everyone should fund. No, of course people shouldn't be free to chose whether to pay for the bbc. Who cares if the majority of people want freedom to choose. Funding the bbc is compulsory and failing to fund it should be punished by law"

Some people think the bbc is good value for money. some people feel it isn't. Giving people freedom to pay for a service if they want it is called being liberal. Telling the majority they have no freedom of choice is called fundamentalism.
38

Shug,

04/11/2008 19:24:52
Bit rich coming from an MP isn't it. cameron jumping on the bandwagon yet again.
39

Big Jock McDoc,

Scotland 04/11/2008 20:45:25
The BBC is like an old decripit dog that should be taken round the shed and put out of it's misery.

A more cost effective and far cheaper method of increasing standards and bringing culture to the masses is to offer licence fee money to the commercial channels.

At the moment without subsidies, they are able to produce superior shows than the BBC who are unable to produce anything without the london-centric liberal middle-class viewpoint that it has become infamous for. Any Scot can see this patronising attitude by claiming programmes are Scottish as it is funded by BBC Scotland yet have nothing to do with Scotland.

40

Joseph Gibson,

Ayrshire, UK. 04/11/2008 22:32:35

Its time that the people of the United Kingdom pull the plug on bloated expenses, gifts/bonsus and salaries of our so faithful and trusted politicians.
41

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 05/11/2008 08:56:46
Start with the politicians first Dave. A big cull there wouldn't go amiss.
42

Doh,

05/11/2008 11:36:25


And time to have less than journalists and coverage of the US election - that can be scaled back.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Has David Cameron done enough to prove he can be Prime Minister?
Yes
No

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.