Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

The hunt is On.
Sponsored by
Can you track down Scotland's wildest beastie?

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Osborne loses fundraising job as he owns up to 'mistake'



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 28 October 2008
GEORGE Osborne yesterday admitted he had made a "mistake" in his dealings with a Russian oligarch as he revealed he had given up his fundraising role in the Conservative Party.

The shadow chancellor said he regretted sparking a row over alleged talks with Oleg Deripaska about a £50,000 donation, which engulfed his party and threatened his own job.

He spoke as a poll showed his standing in the country had plummeted.

Mr Osborne said: "I neither asked for money nor received any, but I did make a mistake. It didn't look very good, and I regret that."

Asked if he had shown a lack of judgment in his dealings with the aluminium baron, said to be Russia's richest tycoon, he replied: "I think the real judgment is, can you learn from mistakes you make?

"I have changed the way that I am going to operate when it comes to fundraising and I will not discuss individual donations with individual donors.

"That, I think, is an appropriate thing for me to do."

Mr Osborne was stripped of his fundraising role after discussions with David Cameron, the Tory leader, who reportedly referred to him behaving like a "prat" over the affair.

But Mr Cameron toned his down criticism yesterday, saying: "We have all learnt lessons from this. There is no doubt about that. George Osborne has been very frank about explaining what they are."

But last night, Geoff Hoon, the Transport Secretary, said: "George Osborne's judgment is wrong. And once again, it is because he creates headlines on the hoof without care for the consequences. His mistakes just go to show why this is no time for a novice."

Vincent Cable, the Liberal Democrats' Treasury spokesman, appeared more forgiving. "He (Mr Osborne] did show very bad judgment in meeting this guy (Mr Deripaska] five times. If he is effectively apologising, I am sure that is the line under his particular involvement."

An opinion tracker of 5,000 voters across the UK by PoliticsHome Phi5000, powered by YouGov, found Mr Osborne's approval rating had dropped from -11 to -20, making him the most unpopular high-profile Conservative.

But he was not the only one to be tarnished by his brush with Mr Deripaska. Lord Mandelson, the Business Secretary, on a trade visit to Moscow, was besieged by reporters questioning him about his meetings with the billionaire during his time as the EU trade commissioner.

Graham Watson, a Liberal Democrat MEP, said EU rules stated that a commissioner had to detail all hospitality received, even in their private life. "Peter Mandelson cannot hide behind an excuse of it being a holiday," he said.





The full article contains 450 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 27 October 2008 9:52 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Conservative Party
 
1

subrosa,

28/10/2008 00:32:02
Why do the press continue to haunt Osborne when Mandelson's history with these billionaires goes back a great deal further? Plus Mandelson's job in the EU commanded discretion and transparency and he certainly didn't show that.

I do hope the EU make further investigations.
2

Rufus T. Fireball,

Grampian 28/10/2008 05:53:54
Brown’s plan for ‘national British day’ is shelved

Not much about this in the paper today?
3

Boy Wonder,

28/10/2008 07:29:39
Osborne should resign from his post completely.
4

Queen D,

Glasgow 28/10/2008 07:54:17
This paper is disgusting .I am incensed by the message which has appeared regarding my post.
I will be writing to Mr Bowdler again about the moderation on this site, at no time do I use obscene language and at no time do I use profane language.
A method of censorship because you don't like the comment?
5

Queen D,

Glasgow 28/10/2008 07:58:25
As was saying ,prior to being told I had used an obscenity, the BBC led this particular withch hunt and the Press stupidly followed suit.
Every political blog on the BBC was inundated with angry comment.
It will all still be there if you care to look and if the Beeb has not removed them!
6

Andrew Allan,

28/10/2008 07:59:01
How very interesting, a chancellor, although a shadow chancellor, losing their ability to be a fundraiser. How could the country possible trust a person their own party can't trust to raise money honestly?
7

Rufus T. Fireball,

Grampian 28/10/2008 08:21:23
The news this week that Russian billionaire Oleg Deripaska and hedge fund manger Nathanial Rothschild are embroiled in a row over illegal donations to the UK’s Conservative Party, has inadvertently thrown light on a multi-billion euro project to build a super-port complex in Montenegro that will house hundreds of the world's most luxurious yachts.

Rothschild and Deripaska are two backers of the €650m ($832m) initiative that when complete, will offer owners of 780 luxury yachts a place to moor in a country being billed as a new generation haven with a business-friendly tax regime.

The pair have also been involved this week in a blow-up over the alleged solicitation of funds from Deripaska by the UK's shadow Chancellor George Osbourne and senior Conservative Party fundraise, Andrew Freeman, who were both introduced to the oligarch by Rothschild.

Meetings were allegedly held, among other places, on Deripaska's own luxury yacht.

The Montenegro project in the bay of Kotor in Tiva is being commissioned by mining group Barrick Gold, whose chief executive Peter Munk, admits: “I don’t own a yacht. I prefer to charter”.

Munk, an 80-year old Canadian billionaire, is in partnership with Lord Rothschild, his son Nathanial, Deripaska and French luxury-goods tycoon Bernard Arnault. Montenegro's prime minister, Milo Djukanovic, is also backing the project.

Corporate tax in the country stands at 9%, personal income tax is set to be reduced to 9% from 15%, and capital gains tax is zero, according to the Montenegro Investment Promotion Agency.

But for Munk, the attractions of Montenegro go far beyond tax issues: “It’s all about boats,” he says. Djukanovic first approached Munk with the idea of the port refurbishment four years ago, at that point a graveyard for rusting naval hulks dating back to the Cold War.

When the country gained its independence from Serbia two years ago, development began in earnest.
A dilapidated naval base has been transformed. “It’s
8

Mr. Lachie Todd,

Edinburgh 28/10/2008 08:44:05
After 6 days in self-imposed purdah, the coy Mr Osborne has emerged too late to express contrition for his misjudgement in this matter?

Instead of brazening it out like Lord Mandelson, who is only too well used to dealing with scandals, an opinon poll this morning indicates that in one month, Labour have slashed the Tories runaway lead by 9 points!

Messrs, Cameron and Osborne have only proved Brown's
point that this is no time for novices!
9

Alan B,

28/10/2008 09:44:20
Cameron needed to sack Osbourne to send out a clear message that the tories had changed and would not involve themselves in such financial dodgy dealings.

By allowing Osbourne to continue the tories look no better than the scandal ridden labour party who seem to be swarmed by their own corruption.
10

Rasco,

28/10/2008 09:53:34
I'm not in favour of Osbourne but at least he has admitted he was wrong and sorry for what happened not like some other people who did take money and still waiting for Broon or Darling admit they got things wrong but then again they are Lab. and never get things wrong.
11

Alan B,

28/10/2008 10:38:47
#Rasco

I think most people will realise the tories are amatuers when it comes to financial dodgy dealings compared to the Blair, Brown and Mandleson access.
12

tommytommy,

28/10/2008 13:52:53
A shadow Chancellor who cant keep his fund raising post.

He did ask a third party to ask about the donation.

I hope his denial is taken to task by his "pals"
13

steve52,

Kinfauns 28/10/2008 14:12:05
Osbourne was doing what comes naturally and has got his cumuppance. Now what about Mandelson? Just what was he up to? Did he do any favours for the Russian to help with his business dealings with the EU? Some may say this is very doggy as when you fly with the crows etc. but I could not comment.

I always wondered how a man tossed out by his party for lying about a mortgage can suddenly afford a £3.5 million home. Perhaps he won the lottery....
14

tommytommy,

28/10/2008 14:28:52
12

Where have you been living?
Archer,The Simple Sword of Truth,Profumo to mention three.
15

Obama-man,

Checking his wallet. 28/10/2008 14:33:51
WOW! I thought we had some real seedy characters in US politics, but you brits can sure teach us a thing or two about lining our pockets.

Let me get this straight, both Osbourne and what's his name, mandyson ? both these guys are high-ranking politicians in the UK, have I got that right ?.

I had no idea your parties were so into sleaze and corruption, looks like our Republicans are not alone lol lol.

Man, no wonder the scots are on an independence trip.
Who on this God's earth would vote for a party that employs those 2 bozzos? Good luck to the scots I say.

Hey guys, you need any back-up just let me know, hell I may even pop over to check out that little election your having just after "The Big One".

You got your, what do you call them in the free world again, ah yes election observers all fired up.? Sure sounds like you need them. As I say, good luck to you Scots and if those corrupt officials from London city hall try their sleazy tricks in your state, you just holler . Bye.
16

Joe Macdelta.,

28/10/2008 17:23:46
Politicians should be beyond reproach, therefore Osbourne and Mandelson shoud both resign from parliment, Mandelson especialy it should be 3 strikes and your out for good.
17

The Federalist (the poster formerly know as NAUON),

28/10/2008 17:57:36
The only thing Osbourne is sorry for is that he got caught.

He's not just the Shadow Chancellor but a Shady Chancer.
18

Alan B,

28/10/2008 18:49:36
#15 tommytommy

First of all i have not said the tories do not get involved in financial scandals but that labour since Blair have been far more openly corrupt.

It used to be said tories tended to get caught in sex scandals and labour financial. There is some truth in that.

If you look at Archer, it was about lying under oath regarding a prostitute.

Under the tories during thatchers time parties could do raise funds freely without declaration. Labour brought in rules to stop the tories getting so much funding and talked about openess in funding and have since broken these rules and worked the system to avoid declaration.

They said declare donations so they worked the system to use undeclared loans.

We have never had a prime minister investigated before by the police. And few think he was not guilty.

Since then we have had law breaking all over the place. Look at the deputy leader race where most were involved in dodgy donations. We had donations via intermediataries to avoid declarating the donator. How many went to jail?

Tory scandals tended to be individuals and not a systematic. eg cash for questions. Whereas labour scandals tend to go right to the prime minister and involve those right at the top.

Labour come across far worse as they kept breaking the rules they brought in.

Also i have never known a government to bring back so many minister who resign in disgrace. Tory resigniations for indiscressions tended to stay resigned.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.