Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

The hunt is On.
Sponsored by
Can you track down Scotland's wildest beastie?

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Salmond hails Pentland Firth Europe's powerhouse



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 30 September 2008
THE waters of the Pentland Firth are set to become the epicentre of Scotland's future in renewable energy with the equivalent power of 20 conventional stations, according to Alex Salmond, the First Minister.


On a visit to Caithness yesterday, Mr Salmond also made it clear that any move to have the Firth, considered to be one of the best tidal energy hotspots on earth, designated under environmental regulations would not stand in the way of the energy
revolution.

The First Minister spoke as the Crown Estate confirmed it is opening up the firth seabed for applications for commercial-scale marine energy development. It is estimated that more than 700MW of energy could be generated by 2020, but Mr Salmond said there is potential for 20-30 times that amount.

In addition to the environmental benefits, he said marine renewables could kick-start economic regeneration in the area to counter the rundown of the Dounreay nuclear plant.

The Crown Estate's announcement means the first marine energy devices could be in the water by 2010 or 2011.

Rob Hastings, the director of the marine estate at the Crown Estate, said: "Unlocking the potential of the Pentland Firth is crucial to meeting Scottish Government renewable targets, stimulating the north of Scotland economy and boosting the fledgling renewables industry."

ScottishPower also confirmed it expects to lodge planning applications next summer for large-tidal stream projects in the Pentland Firth, Islay and off the North Antrim coast.

Between five and 20 tidal turbines will be installed in each site, with each turbine having an installed capacity of 1MW. This could lead to a total output of 60MW, enough for more than 40,000 homes.

A new energy company, based in Scotland, has been set up with a view to building the tidal machines.

Giving the keynote address to the Caithness Regeneration Conference, Mr Salmond said the announcements are a significant step in Scotland's journey to become a world leader in renewable energy: "We have talked about the potential of marine power for many years and it's now here and now; it's not in the hereafter any more.

"The tides in the Pentland Firth potentially have enough energy to be the powerhouse of Europe in terms of future electricity supplies."

He said existing onshore transmission lines can cope with some expansion, but for the "extraordinary" amounts of energy which could be produced in future new seabed inter-connectors would be needed.

"The sort of power that potentially could come from this area is not some hundreds of megawatts, its not just like one conventional power station, its 20 gigawatts and more than that, that's like 20 conventional power stations.

"The economics of transporting power underwater is advancing by leaps and bounds and we have to get in a position where we have a supergrid from Scotland, not just to England but across to Europe to sell that energy to people who need it."

On the possibility of a seabird reserve being established in the Pentland Firth, the First Minister was unequivocal: "The agencies have their statutory responsibilities to carry out but nothing is going to be allowed to stop the potential that Scotland has to harness these vast natural resources. The resources of the seas are the key to much of Scotland's future."

John Thurso, the Caithness and Sutherland MP, said: "We are now a long way down the road to turning what was seen as a dream five years ago into a reality.

"That reality is about high quality jobs in this community and a future post-Dounreay."

Meanwhile, Scrabster Harbour Trust is seeking £50 million investment to develop to serve the marine renewables and oil and gas sectors. It said this could create 130 jobs and generate and extra £5.8 million to the Caithness economy.





The full article contains 638 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

frank mcbride,

lusitania 30/09/2008 00:32:56
This project, when it comes to pass will prove more important to the cause of Independence than Glasgow East or Glenrothes.

A brave initiative by the SNP Scottish Government.
2

Sierra Foothills Scot,

Diamond Springs 30/09/2008 03:59:18
#2 bring them om on -

Iain Gray f*rts and his supporters cheer.

Sad, isn't it?
3

somerferg,

perth 30/09/2008 04:55:13

#2 - the only sad thing around is you and your purile comment.
4

nabodican,

Rural Scotland 30/09/2008 06:10:31
Alex Salmond has had nothing to do with this.
Professor Ian Bryden highlighted the potential of the Pentland firth many years ago and the fact that the Crown estates are now giving out licenses is a UK issue.
On top of this 20 X 1MW turbines comes to less installed capacity than what has been taken out of hydro in order to qualify for ROCS.
While the Pentland Firth along with many other areas around Scotlands coastline does have great potential for electricity generation, nothing will happen in a hurry unless all the subsidies that are presently being given to the wind industry are stopped and the money invested in marine generation instead.
One thing is for sure - neither the SNP or Labour will do anything about it.
5

Angleland Isover,

The island of Scotland 30/09/2008 07:00:00
Our water,our wind,our country.
6

donald,

glasgow 30/09/2008 07:34:38
Labour's wind and flatulence against any development in Scotland..
7

danielrober,

30/09/2008 07:38:39
Any chance of Alec.S his kingship saying well done to the engineers working at BE (the nuclear company) and BNFL (another nuclear company) for their power transmission work that makes this possible?
8

Joe,

Liberton Brae 30/09/2008 08:05:08
#7..All the wind and flatulence is coming from the usual SNP supporters in these forums?
9

Rufus T. Firefly,

30/09/2008 08:23:26
Lets not get carried away.

The technology is still at the research stage and may well not work in such a hostile environment..

Thank goodness our good friends in England have the sense to build new nuclear power stations.

At least we will be able to import electricity from a trusted source.

It will help make up for the shortfall that will inevitably happen as a result of the energy policies of Salmond and his terrified subservient SNP MSPs.
10

fred bloggs,

Edinburgh 30/09/2008 08:47:01
5: Tidal generators will receive three times the number of ROCs as wind generators.
11

fred bloggs,

Edinburgh 30/09/2008 09:25:12
'Scots to snap up UK marine renewables with extra ROC subsidies'

- http://www.newenergyfocus.com/do/ecco.py/view_item?listid=1&listcatid=32&listitemid=1717
12

Jacqueline Hyde ,

On the shelf 30/09/2008 09:29:07
I don't see where John Thurso's "high quality jobs" are going to come from. The generators will be manufactured outside Caithness, they'll be installed by imported specialist crews, the generators can be monitored and controlled from anywhere on the planet and local maintenance requirements will be negligible. The electrity produced will be used to create jobs in the south of Scotland and England with up to 30% of it being wasted in transmission.

Caithness can potentially boast some of the best harbours in Europe and, with all this generating power on the doorstep, is perfectly placed for manufacturing plants with high energy demands. Very cheap - or even free - electricity for the long term is, I'm sure, a far more attractive carrot than the current system of quick-fix grants. Better still, the incentive needn't cost the government (and taxpayer) a bean.

It's high time we saw a long term approach to the harvesting of our resources - instead of simply flogging off the family silver.

However, if the Scottish Government
13

John S,

30/09/2008 09:35:59
System Transfers
N.Ireland to Great Britain: 49MW
France to Great Britain : 2005MW
North-South: 6127MW
Scot - Eng: 1936MW
30/09/2008 09:33:00
14

AJM,

30/09/2008 09:40:11
The ability to harness the hostile tidal energy has nothing to do with any politician of any of the political parties. All the credit must go to the engineers.

To suggest that he or his party is in some way are enabling the technological results is getting above his station in life. Apart from the government or the executive giving money to the engineering companies to create the environment for achievement, thats it. To suggest that he is going not going to allow anything to get in the way, when there is nothing in the way is laughable. All this is is a policition kissing a baby, in this instance an infant technology. Which has still to grow up and show its ability in the hostile world of the Pentland Firth. There will be many a dissapointment, then where will he be, finding another baby to kiss.

Some might recall the way that the pentland firth dealt with a linkspan that was built by engineers who thought that they understood the power of the seas along that bit of coast. It might be one of the worlds tidal hotspots but has one that has seen the way the water rushes out of Scapa flow I have a great respect for the power of this natural funnel. It is going to make fools out of some people for a time yet I suspect.
15

Ewan M,

30/09/2008 10:36:44
Watched a report lst night on Newnight who interviewed Alex salmonds lead advisor on this. He said more testing should be done and the technology was not yet proven for such strong currents in the Pentland Firth. Could prove to be a massive failure, hope not but the risks are certainly there.
16

Ewan M,

30/09/2008 10:38:31
#18 Alex Salmond trying to jump on the back of others work to promote his political ambitions, never!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
17

fresian,

edinburgh 30/09/2008 10:50:51
#20, No more so than any other politician before him!
18

David Ban,

04620 Vera Spain 30/09/2008 10:53:23
The project is outstanding in its potential. I note the comments of 19#, but when the technology was needed for the extraction of oil in the treacherous conditions of the North Sea the technology was developed- whatever the cost in men and materials. Scotland went through the "Wild West" oil frontier and with the likes of Wee Eck and Scots behind him energy from the tital races will come!

Note the commnents of Andrew Marr in his recent outstanding book on the recent political history of the UK from 1945 until the present day. He says so little is written about "Scotland´s Oil" which has a tremendous history and has pumped millions into the economy, there is no museum and in the politician´s autobiographies it is hardly given a mention.

You can draw your own conclusions, but the story of the tidal races and the development of electric power must be told for the future generations of Scots.
Nuclear Energy is a poisoned chalice and I hope the poisoned residue of the atomic plants are not to be dumped near my birthplace in Sutherland.
19

DaveK,

Edinburgh 30/09/2008 11:05:11
#6 Our water,our wind,our country.
Yes it's called Britain, welcome.
20

danielrober,

30/09/2008 11:21:38
# Dave from Barra

You crack me up some times, great.
21

ascrever,

Fife 30/09/2008 12:16:39
This power producing oportunity has real potential and should be supported technically financially and politically by everyone with an interest in the future of Scotland! In support of #16 and common sence, it is appropriate to move the benefit of technological development to the source of the power. Power-users including profitable industry,commerce and housing should be developed near the power source, rather than cow-towing to the demands of markets elsewhere, such as London, so avoiding both transmission losses and skewed population distribution. The parallel of the oil benefits in the Scottish Oil Capital of Aberdeen should be obvious and #22 is absolutely right.
22

The Federalist (the poster formerly know as NAUON),

30/09/2008 12:33:07
These so-called "green" alternatives are anything but green and have their own environmental problems:

* Hydroelectric - apart from the fact that reservoirs often cover agriculturally productive, alluvial bottomland, dams alter the existing plant and animal species in the ecosystem. Also within the reservoirs, fluctuations of water levels alter shorelines and cause downstream erosion. Beyond the reservoirs downstream water quality is also reduced affecting both flaura and fauna.

* Wind Power - apart from associated electromagnetic intereference and noise issues, the main environmental criticism is that they reduce the aethetic quality of the area they are located. Because they rely on a high regular windspeed (20kph+) the best locations are often rural sites - often existing beuaty spots because of their location.

* Photovoltaics - the one major environmental problem of photovolataics is the use of toxic chemicals such as cadmium sulfide and gallium arsenide in their manufacture

* Solar Thermal Conversion - because this relies on the use of concentrated saline ponds the risk of salt leeching into the soil is increased. Also many such ponds need toxic chemicals to prevent algae growth.

* Tidal energy - the main environmental consequence of such schemes is that the reduction in tidal flow prevents any pollutants that have been washed off the land being diluted effectively, not to mention issues such as the build up of sediments and rdeuced areas for wildlife such as wading birds.

* Wave energy - apart from being possible navigation hazards, the biggest environmental concern is the actual cabling to tranfer power to shore

To pretend as some do in the green lobby that these methods of energy production are somehow cleaner than tradional power production is dishonest in the extreme.
23

Rufus T. Firefly,

30/09/2008 13:23:22
#25 Do me a favour and scan in your Scottish Passport and email it to me. I have always wanted to see one.
24

DaveK,

Edinburgh 30/09/2008 13:51:30
# 30 Ahh you beat me to it! Although I believe you can buy covers for your passport in those tacky tartan places, you know the ones that sell kilt towels, see you Jimmy Hats and SNP policy documents.
25

The Federalist (the poster formerly know as NAUON),

30/09/2008 14:17:15
#32 I have decided to follow suit.

Yes, it is a violation of my human rights that I am prevented from having official recognition of my nationality.

Thanks for pointing that out.

However, I decide. The world is my country, not Britain or Scotland.

What are you going to do about it?
26

57vintage,

Bridge of Don 30/09/2008 16:57:23
#6

"Our water,our wind,our country"

I often wonder what the SNP official reaction would be if The Shetland Movement declared:

"Oor oil, oor islands"?

How far would they be prepared to let independence go?

Possibly not thought through?
27

The Federalist (the poster formerly know as NAUON),

30/09/2008 17:20:45
#40 Unusual for me but I'm going to defend the Nats on this point.

The Shetland issue is a red herring.

The only party that in recent times who has advocated Shetland Independence is the UKIP. There has not been a candidate for the Orkney & Shetland movements since the 1987 election where, interestingly, the SNP stood aside.

My understanding is that the SNP have never ever rejected the right of autonomy for Shetland and Orkney.

But whilst there is no real organised Shetland Movement this issue is very much on the back burner.
28

Robin Brown,

California 30/09/2008 18:15:24
"Salmond hails Pentland Firth"

Scotland hails Salmond.

All hail the great one.

It couldn't get any better - but it probably will.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.