Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

The hunt is On.
Sponsored by
Can you track down Scotland's wildest beastie?

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

SSE sells half of giant wind farm project to Npower for £308m



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 04 November 2008
SCOTTISH & Southern Energy has offloaded a 50 per cent stake in the Greater Gabbard project, which is expected to become the world's largest wind farm.
The Perth-based company said Npower renewables, the UK renewables business of Germany's RWE, was paying £308 million for the stake, a price that included capital expenditure undertaken so far.

Greater Gabbard was created as a joint venture between
Airtricity, the Irish wind farm company, and US engineering company Fluor.

SSE, now Scotland's second-largest company by market capitalisation, acquired half of the project when it bought Airtricity for £1.1 billion in February.

It gained outright control of the project in May, paying £40m to Fluor, which sold the stake after securing the contract to construct the wind farm.

Under the deal, RWE will reimburse SSE for 50 per cent of the capital costs it has already incurred in the project.

A spokesman for SSE refused to give details on how much the company had spent so far, ahead of its interim results announcement later this month.

The spokesman said the sale was designed to "spread the risk" of the project. The total cost of the wind farm is expected to be about £1.3bn.

Analysts had speculated that the company would struggle to find a willing partner to take on half of the project in the current economic climate.

SSE will act as the operator of the project under a management services agreement, which covers both the construction and operational phases.

Onshore construction has already started, with offshore work expected to begin in the second half of 2009, with the first power being generated in 2010 and final completion in 2011.

Ian Marchant, chief executive of SSE, welcomed RWE's involvement, saying its long-term involvement in offshore developments would complement his company's expertise in major renewable projects.

"This year has been characterised by high and volatile prices for fossil fuels and by political uncertainty in key oil and gas producing regions," Marchant said. "All of this again demonstrates the long-term value of energy sources which are both renewable and indigenous."

Marchant said Greater Gabbard was "a major development in every sense" and the company was focused on ensuring smooth and timely construction "so that it can begin to play its important part in meeting the UK's energy needs as soon as possible".

Located east of Felixstowe in the Thames estuary, the site wil have up to 140 turbines e built on two sandbanks about 12 miles offshore.

By the time it is completed in 2011, the wind farm is expected to generate up to 500 megawatts, enough to power about 415,000 homes.



The full article contains 453 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

nabodican,

Rural Scotland 04/11/2008 00:47:17
We can look forward to our bills going up even more because of this wind power station
2

Harbinger,

Cloud cuckoo land 04/11/2008 13:30:19
"expected to generate up to 500 megawatts, enough to power about 415,000 homes."

The usual scam about the amount of power provided: 500 MW is the nameplate capacity, likely outcome 20-25% of that, ie, 100-125 MW, number of homes, a quarter of the 415,000.
3

Drummer1,

Troon 04/11/2008 16:02:49
We can look forward to our bills going down eventually because of this wind power station, as gas/oil/uranium (-235) resources continue to deplete and rise in cost.
4

AndrewLee,

Dublin 04/11/2008 16:31:58
Nameplate capacity of 500MB * capacity allowance (expected percentage of the time the turbines will be providing electricity) which is normally reckoned around 30% for onshore and 35% for offshore is allowed for when calculating what "number of homes" are powered.
Wind power is all upfront costs with virtually nil running costs. When the wind is blowing the electricity providers power down the MOST EXPENSIVE other power providers - mostly natural gas. Also the more wind farms we have connected to the grid, the more likely it is that wind is blowing somewhere in the country.
They wouldn't be building them if there wasn't a good reason.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.